Heisman voter: It's time for transparency in the vote

Over at the Gainesville (Florida) Sun, Heisman voter Pat Dooley argues that it's about time for some transparency in the Heisman balloting.

You hear those of us in the media screaming from the top of the building that the coaches must have transparency when it comes to their poll. We won that battle finally, but shouldn’t the Heisman votes also be made available to anyone who wants to see them? I want to know the 43 people who voted Tim Tebow No. 1 on their ballots. I want to know which 538 people left Ndamukong Suh off their ballots and which two voted Golden Tate first.

I couldn't agree more. At a minimum, the Heisman Trust should reveal who the list of voters are.

Kari Chisholm | December 19, 2009 | Comment on This Post (3 so far)
Permalink: Heisman voter: It's time for transparency in the vote

Comments

SPONSORED LINK

Well we know at least one that voted Tate first.

Posted by: Pat | Dec 19, 2009 1:18:09 PM

Heisman is a joke. This year the best player didnt win.

Posted by: terrible | Dec 24, 2009 2:43:11 PM

Q: What do you get when you put 538 Heisman voters together?

A: A lot of slobber and strange noises causes they are all retarded.

Posted by: Jimmy | Jan 7, 2010 1:57:14 PM


Post a comment






The H------ Memorial Trophy is a registered trademark of the H------ Memorial Trophy Trust. This site is not affiliated with the Trust, not even a little. We're not even using the H------ word, since they don't want us to. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

Copyright to and responsibility for all posts and comments are owned by their respective authors.

Obviously, the posts and comments here are the views of their authors, and not of anyone else.

While we're strong believers in free speech, we reserve the right to delete comment spam or other offensive material. Our contributors, however, reserve the right to embarass themselves in public.